Project-bound document, validation and audit work
Sources can be bounded per work object, the provider remains accountable for review and decision, and traceable groundwork is needed across multiple requirements.
CDMO / CMO · ORGANISATIONAL FIT
traqx fits provider-side work at a CDMO or CMO involving client requirements, quality agreements, internal procedures, SOPs, validation records and audit evidence within a defined project and source scope. traqx does not replace a QMS, MES or customer portal and does not transfer quality responsibility to the software.
THREE CONCRETE SITUATIONS
Each situation keeps client, site and process sources visibly separate. Responsibility and release remain with the organisations involved.
CONTROLLED INPUTS
Defined client project, signed Quality Agreement, current client requirements and approved site SOPs.
AGENT TASK
Reviewer Agent · Compares the sources within the project scope and marks contradictory or unresolved requirements.
REVIEWABLE RESULT
Evidenced conflict and open-point list with the origin of each statement visible.
HUMAN / SYSTEM BOUNDARY
Provider and client resolve priority and responsibility; traqx changes neither the contract nor the quality agreement.
CONTROLLED INPUTS
Controlled site or client work instruction, agreed project source set, current document template and approved reason for change.
AGENT TASK
SOP Agent · Prepares the revision against the agreed sources and keeps source and rationale visible on each change.
REVIEWABLE RESULT
Word file with tracked changes, source and rationale comments, and an updated version history.
HUMAN / SYSTEM BOUNDARY
The responsible document owner reviews and releases it; this implies neither a customer portal nor cross-project control.
CONTROLLED INPUTS
Documented client or authority question, approved project file, selected site records, and contractual and regulatory sources within the agreed scope.
AGENT TASK
Audit Agent · Researches inside the bounded source room and separates evidenced statements from missing evidence and open points.
REVIEWABLE RESULT
Cited answer draft, evidence path and gap list for subject-matter review.
HUMAN / SYSTEM BOUNDARY
The organisations involved own the answer and evidence; traqx assumes neither client nor provider responsibilities.
CONTROLLED WORKING MODEL
traqx prepares work inside the defined project. Client and contractor responsibilities remain clearly assigned outside the software.
The quality agreement, client documents, site SOPs, templates and external requirements are assigned to the concrete work object.
Result · defined project contexttraqx researches inside the defined source room and creates reviewable groundwork for the individual work package.
Result · project-bound suggestionEvidence passages and unresolved conflicts remain visible instead of silently merging client and site requirements.
Result · visible need for clarificationThe responsible experts on the provider and, where applicable, client side review within the agreed quality process.
Result · assigned human decisionFIT / BOUNDARY
This page addresses only the CDMO/CMO's own quality process, not the sponsor view of contractor oversight.
OPTIONAL PROCESS EXTENSION: A separately bookable GxP module is only added when a recurring process also needs a preconfigured method, templates, defined work objects and a review path. When a GxP module is added →
Sources can be bounded per work object, the provider remains accountable for review and decision, and traceable groundwork is needed across multiple requirements.
traqx promises neither a customer portal nor cross-project control and does not transfer client or contractor responsibility.
PRODUCT EVIDENCE, NOT A CUSTOMER CLAIM
traqx is EU-hosted and works in controlled source rooms; customer documents stay within the agreed tenant and hosting scope and are not used for model training. Experts review and decide. The product dossiers show real system views with synthetic demo data—not CDMO/CMO customer outcomes.
Trust Architecture → View product dossiers →VISIBLE PRIMARY SOURCES
Chapter 7 addresses outsourced activities and the written definition and control between contract giver and contract acceptor. This page infers no transfer of responsibility to traqx from it.
The official collection places Chapter 7 in the EU GMP framework. Which activity and site are actually affected remains a customer scope question.
FAQ
traqx fits provider-side work at a CDMO or CMO involving client requirements, quality agreements, internal procedures, SOPs, validation records and audit evidence within a defined project and source scope. traqx does not replace a QMS, MES or customer portal and does not transfer quality responsibility to the software.
No. This page promises neither cross-project control nor a customer portal. Every use case shown works within one defined project, source room and work object.
Sources are assigned to the concrete project and work object with their respective provenance. Answer drafts, conflict lists and document updates retain those links; unresolved priorities are identified as open points.
No. Contractual and regulatory responsibilities remain with the involved organizations and their quality process. traqx prepares source-bound work and makes open points visible.
FRAME THE PROVIDER PROCESS
We check source separation, agent task, review, project scope and system boundary on one real work object.
Book a meeting →Other industries: All industries · Pharmaceuticals · Medical devices · Biotech · Contract research organizations