01 · Project contextWhich changes were derived from the work case?
The change overview shows affected locations, proposed updates and their rationale before the reviewer enters the complete document.
PRACTICE CASE · PRODUCT EVIDENCE
This is what evidenced GxP work looks like: one practice case, four product dossiers.
Dr. Philipp Cavelius validates customer systems with traqx — every statement carries its source and check status, and the review version comes back as a Word file. The four dossiers show exactly these control points in the system: real screens from the synthetic OpenDMS demo project, without customer data and without claiming an outcome metric.
Book your personal live demo
View the practice case
No obligation · personal · straight in the calendar
- Named practice case
- Visible provenance
- Real product views
- Word review version as output
A CASE FROM THE CONSULTING PRACTICE
Dr. Philipp Cavelius validates customer systems with traqx — evidenced instead of assembled.
Dr. Philipp Cavelius works in the CSV consulting team traqx emerged from, and validates customer systems with traqx. One case from that practice.
- Problem
- URS, risk analysis and test documents in Word — sources scattered across mail attachments and file shares, evidence collected at the end.
- Goal
- A work state where every statement carries its source and verification status — review-ready from the first draft instead of reconstruction before the review.
- Solution
- With traqx, evidenced Word review versions with tracked changes are the working result — traceability and the audit trail keep up while the work happens.
With traqx I start from an evidenced draft instead of an empty document. Source and status stay visible — the professional decision stays with me.
REAL WORK CASEDr. Philipp CaveliusCSV specialist in the consulting team traqx emerged fromFOUR PRODUCT DOSSIERS
The decisive control points, directly in the system.
Each dossier answers one concrete review question. The views come from the synthetic OpenDMS demo project and contain no customer data.
02 · Impact assessmentWhich project documents are affected by the decision?
The agent evaluates the meeting decision against the connected source space and makes affected documents and open checks visible.
03 · Word change evidenceWhat supports this change?
The Word file shows tracked changes. Comments keep the source and rationale directly next to the affected paragraph.
04 · Human reviewWhich changes does the expert accept?
The Word file shows every proposal as a tracked change. The reviewer accepts, corrects or rejects it; traqx never marks its own draft as approved.
EVIDENCE, CLEANLY SEPARATED
A practice case is not a customer case study.
The named case visibly comes from the consulting team traqx emerged from. Separately, the dossiers evidence the product states. This page claims no time saving, return on investment (ROI) or customer outcome.
YOUR WORK CASE
Evaluate traqx on your own document.
In the 15-minute introductory call, we clarify your document case, the relevant sources and who reviews the result. You see whether traqx fits this work case.
Book your personal live demo
No obligation · personal · straight in the calendar