Tool zoo instead of clarity
Every additional system adds maintenance, training and validation overhead.
FEATURE · SYSTEM FIT
The first question every head of QA asks: how does traqx fit into the regulated process? your QMS/DMS stays leading, the handover is a Word file with full history, and your team maintains the sources in your own tenant. EU-hosted, no model training.
No obligation · personal · straight in the calendar
WHAT YOU GAIN
THE PROBLEM
Every QA lead's justified scepticism — and we share it.
Every additional system adds maintenance, training and validation overhead.
Moving established processes? That risk lands on your team.
What does the tool replace, and what not? Without an answer, it becomes an audit topic.
A tool without a defined boundary becomes an audit liability, not an audit asset.
THE SOLUTION
traqx complements your landscape — it does not replace it.
traqx prepares document work — no eQMS, no DMS, no autonomous QA decisions.
Work leaves traqx as a .docx with changes, comments and history.
Approval and document control keep running in your QMS/DMS — no migration.
EU tenant and hosting scope; no model training on your data.
HOW IT WORKS



FAQ
No — deliberately not. traqx prepares document-based work; control, release and retention stay in the leading system.
As a Word file with tracked changes, comments and version history — via your existing release path. The handover point is clearly defined.
EU-hosted with tenant separation. Your documents are not used for model training. Details for your supplier assessment are in the Trust Fact Sheet.
ON YOUR OWN CASE
In your personal live demo we position traqx in your concrete system landscape — including handover point and data boundary.
No obligation · personal · straight in the calendar