Work case and GxP relevance
Which regulated work is affected, and does every stakeholder understand the same scope?
Decision frame · free PDF
Twelve questions help QA, CSV/Validation, IT and business test whether one concrete AI use case stands up technically, functionally and procedurally.
FOUR ANSWERS EVERY TEAM NEEDS FIRST
Updated 11 July 2026 · traqx GmbH
Direct answer
A GxP AI pilot is ready for a decision when every role is testing the same use case, the approved source scope is fixed and the team has defined how quality, time, errors and review effort will be measured. The result is a documented decision with clear limits, not a general impression from the demo.
What to assess
The twelve questions take your decision team from the first task description to a documented decision about use.
Which regulated work is affected, and does every stakeholder understand the same scope?
Which files and versions count, and can every reference be checked against file and section?
What may AI prepare, and which assessment explicitly stays with a human?
Where is data held, who has access and when does risk-based controlled operation begin?
How will benefit and errors be measured, and who may limit or stop use?
Three core questions
The PDF contains twelve assessment questions, each with a good target state and a clear stop signal.
Documents, versions, owners and excluded drafts need to be fixed before the test.
Stop: the model may draw on arbitrary knowledge.Content, sources, changes and open points are reviewed before anything is accepted.
Stop: the same AI reviews and accepts its own output.A small baseline makes benefit, errors and shifts in review work visible.
Stop: a broad ROI promise replaces measurement.Decision frame
For joint preparation by QA, CSV/Validation, IT and business.
How to use the questions
QA, CSV, IT and business align their boundaries before the meeting.
Ask to see sources, changes, open points and review status in the system.
Document scope, owners, stop signals, measures and the next review date.
FAQ
That depends on intended use. A pure evaluation with synthetic data is different from a system whose output already supports regulated work or a GxP record. Control and test depth need to match the actual risk.
At minimum, include the process owner, QA, CSV/Validation and IT. Depending on the use case, privacy, information security or further subject-matter experts may be needed. Functional, technical and process boundaries should be assessed together.
Measure time to the first review-ready draft, review effort, detected errors, missing sources and required corrections. A small before-and-after baseline is stronger than a broad efficiency claim.
Not only a good answer. Ask to see the controlled source scope, source verification, document changes, open points, traceability, review status and the path back to a human decision.
Assess the real system
We show the traqx System through its sources, document changes and review status. Then we assess how your process and the right module scope fit together.
Request product demo →